Edwin P. Denniss preached this sermon at St. Michael's, Beccles, on 3 May 1843, at the archdeacon's visitation. He frames obedience to the Church of England's Articles and Rubrics not as a matter of personal piety but as the essential bond uniting the established clergy. The sermon is explicitly positioned as a via media, rejecting what Denniss calls 'Roman Superstition' on one side and 'Protestant Dissent' on the other. His preface reveals that publication was urged by a majority of his clerical brethren and churchwardens, though he initially hesitated to print a discourse that included personal vindication.

The Limits of Clerical Interpretation

Denniss insists that clergy have no liberty to interpret the Church's doctrines beyond what the Articles decide. He quotes a source (likely from the Tracts for the Times) stating that subscription to the Articles must be 'an assent to the Doctrines contained in them' without reservation. The sermon argues that at ordination, the Articles are presented as giving 'the right sense of Scripture,' and no qualification or restriction is admissible. This position is tied to a broader claim: if a clergyman cannot honestly subscribe, he cannot 'with any honesty or consistency continue himself a recipient of her honours and emoluments.' The language is pointedly contractual, framing clerical office as a binding agreement rather than a platform for private theological exploration.

Baptismal Regeneration as a Test Case

A central example is the doctrine of baptismal regeneration. Denniss cites the Prayer Book office for infant baptism, which declares the child 'regenerate and grafted into the body of Christ's Church.' He dismisses the interpretation that this is merely anticipatory or based on sponsors' faith, noting that the same prayer is used after private baptism where there are no sponsors. He accuses opponents of inconsistency: they demand 'a literal and grammatical explanation' in other disputes but evade it here. He references the Savoy Conference of 1661, where a proposal to alter the wording to imply future regeneration was rejected on the grounds that denial 'tends to anabaptism and contempt of the Holy Sacrament.' This historical appeal anchors his argument in the Church's own deliberative tradition.

A Via Media Between Extremes

The sermon's preface explicitly states its aim: advocating 'a safe medium between the extremes of Roman Superstition and Protestant Dissent.' Denniss presents the Church of England as the 'purest, truest representative of the Church Apostolical,' having rejected nothing from preceding ages 'but their superstition, or, of their creed, but its novelties.' He warns against both formalism and enthusiasm, urging clergy to be guided by 'plain and literal directions' rather than 'fanciful and fallible interpretations.' The rhetorical structure positions the Articles and Rubrics as a stable, objective authority in a time of ecclesiastical controversy—the 'Eventful Epoch' of 1843, when Tractarian debates were reshaping Anglican identity.

Readers approaching this sermon should note its dual character: it is both a specific occasional address (a visitation sermon) and a published manifesto. Denniss's careful citation of historical precedents and his use of the baptismal controversy as a concrete test of subscription reveal the practical stakes of his argument. The sermon does not attempt to cover all doctrinal points but selects one that crystallizes the tension between literal obedience and interpretive freedom. Those interested in the period's ecclesiastical politics will find here a concise statement of the high-church position on clerical conformity.